2 min read

2016 Election - Tax Positions Compared

May 10, 2016 — Not surprisingly, the tax positions of our presidential candidates differ dramatically, and that is especially true between the parties. Some of the changes proposed by the candidates could significantly alter the current tax system.

The Tax Foundation, a not-for-profit independent tax policy research organization, recently published a study comparing the candidates’ tax policies and the economic impact of the proposals.  A few of the proposals are listed below.

Clinton Proposals

  • Surcharge of 4% to the tax rate for high income taxpayers (over $5 million).
  • Enact the "Buffet Rule" which puts a minimum tax in place for taxpayers with adjusted gross income over $1 million.
  • Redefine long-term capital gains to more than 6 years with varying rates for less than 6 years
  • Enacts a tax on high-frequency trading

Sanders Proposals

  • Adds four new tax brackets with a top rate of 52% and taxes capital gains rate at ordinary rates if household income exceeds $250,000
  • Caps itemized deductions at a 28% rate if household income exceeds $250,000
  • Eliminates the alternative minimum tax, the personal exemption phase out and the Pease Limitation on itemized deductions
  • Creates a new 2.2% income based "health care" premium paid by households as well as creating an additional 6.2% employer side payroll tax and a new 0.2% employer/employee payroll tax.
  • Applies the social security payroll tax to earnings over $250,000
  • Eliminates deferral of income from controlled foreign subsidiaries
  • Limit like-kind exchanges of property to $1 million per taxpayer per year and prohibit the use of like-kind exchanges for art and collectibles.

Trump Proposals

  • Consolidates seven brackets into four brackets with rates of 0%, 10%, 20% and 25%
  • Increases the standard deduction to $25,000 ($50,000 for married filing joint)
  • "Steepening the curve" on the personal exemption and Pease limitation phase-out’s
  • Eliminates the alternative minimum tax, the 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax, and the estate tax systems
  • Reduce the corporate income tax rate to 15% and cap the rate of tax on flow-through business income to 15%.
  • Eliminates deferral of income from controlled foreign subsidiaries
  • Enacts a one-time deemed repatriation tax of 10% on all currently deferred foreign profits

Tax policy appears to be a key issue in the presidential election discussion. The positions listed here are based upon the initial plan laid out by the candidates but will likely change and be refined over the course of the election.  Given the push from all candidates to reform the tax laws, it will be important to research the candidates’ positions and understand the implications as you head to the polls.

To access the full publication including an estimate of the economic impact from the Tax Foundation click here.

The Hidden Value of a QoE: Better Diligence, Better Audits

The Hidden Value of a QoE: Better Diligence, Better Audits

For searchers, a Quality of Earnings (QoE) engagement does more than support a transaction. It sets the foundation for smoother financial reporting...

Read More
Risk in M&A: The Questions That Matter More Than Price

Risk in M&A: The Questions That Matter More Than Price

In most M&A conversations, risk can be oversimplified too quickly. Buyers ask, “What if we overpay?” Sellers worry, “What if we leave money on the...

Read More
Creative Deal Structuring for Independent Searchers: Balancing Price, Risk, and Growth

Creative Deal Structuring for Independent Searchers: Balancing Price, Risk, and Growth

For independent searchers, structuring the right deal isn’t just about finding a great business. It’s about creating the right balance between risk...

Read More